Very little soil covers the carbonate bedrock at El Pilar, and all of the ash layers found there are too old and chemically degraded to have supplied the ash used in the pottery, Catlin reported October 6 in Houston at the annual meeting of the Geological Society of America. Because the Maya pottery typically is both heavy and fragile, it’s unlikely that such items were imported. Instead, she speculates, ash was hauled in for local potters from other areas at great effort — especially considering the Maya had no roads, no pack animals and would have needed to import several tons of the material each year to produce enough everyday dishes and pottery for the site’s thousands of residents.
To see how various combinations of temperature and heating times affected the chemical composition of ash in pottery, Catlin and her colleagues fired pots using a 50-50 mixture of clay from the El Pilar site and volcanic ash of known chemical composition from California. In the tests, for example, the longer the pottery was fired, the more sodium was driven from the material. The hotter the firing temperature, the higher the calcium concentration became. Finally, the firing process didn’t affect the silica content of the pottery at all, Catlin notes.
The ash in the potsherds found at El Pilar is about 78 percent silica, the researchers found. That’s distinctly different than the composition of ash from El Chichón volcano, which lies about 375 kilometers west of El Pilar and spews ash that’s about 58 percent silica. Some archaeologists have suggested that material lofted from El Chichón was used in the Maya pottery, because an ash plume from a 1982 eruption wafted eastward and fell on El Pilar. But the new results don’t support that notion, says Catlin.
She and her colleagues are now analyzing ash from several volcanoes that lie between 350 and 400 kilometers southwest of El Pilar, to see if material spewed from those peaks has a chemical composition that matches the ash used in the Maya pottery. Besides being about 78 percent silica, that ash probably had a 0.4 percent concentration of calcium, the team’s tests suggest (written by Sid Perkins; source ScienceNews).